Macau, China vs United Arab Emirates: Fruit consumption vs. GDP per capita

Macau, China
66.16 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
United Arab Emirates
64.13 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Macau, China rank
126th
United Arab Emirates rank
128th

Fruit consumption vs. GDP per capita over time

  • Macau, China
  • United Arab Emirates
050100150200196119922023

How they compare

Macau, China currently reports 66.16 kilograms per year per capita against 64.13 kilograms per year per capita in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 2.03 kilograms per year per capita.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was United Arab Emirates ahead.

Macau, China ranks 126th and United Arab Emirates ranks 128th of 192 countries.

United Arab Emirates has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Macau, China United Arab Emirates Difference Ahead
1960s 19.34 kilograms per year per capita 27.84 kilograms per year per capita 8.5 kilograms per year per capita United Arab Emirates
1970s 30.19 kilograms per year per capita 112.07 kilograms per year per capita 81.88 kilograms per year per capita United Arab Emirates
1980s 48.14 kilograms per year per capita 149.61 kilograms per year per capita 101.47 kilograms per year per capita United Arab Emirates
1990s 58.27 kilograms per year per capita 124.18 kilograms per year per capita 65.92 kilograms per year per capita United Arab Emirates
2000s 56.54 kilograms per year per capita 94.65 kilograms per year per capita 38.11 kilograms per year per capita United Arab Emirates
2010s 57.82 kilograms per year per capita 70.89 kilograms per year per capita 13.07 kilograms per year per capita United Arab Emirates
2020s 65.66 kilograms per year per capita 82.06 kilograms per year per capita 16.39 kilograms per year per capita United Arab Emirates

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit consumption vs. gdp per capita, Macau, China or United Arab Emirates?
Macau, China, at 66.16 kilograms per year per capita against 64.13 kilograms per year per capita in United Arab Emirates as of 2023.
What is the difference in fruit consumption vs. gdp per capita between Macau, China and United Arab Emirates?
2.03 kilograms per year per capita, with Macau, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Macau, China and United Arab Emirates?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Macau, China and United Arab Emirates rank globally for fruit consumption vs. gdp per capita?
Macau, China ranks 126th and United Arab Emirates ranks 128th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Fruit consumption vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Macau, China vs United Arab Emirates: Fruit consumption vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-consumption-vs-gdp-per-capita/macao-sar-china/united-arab-emirates/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-consumption-vs-gdp-per-capita/macao-sar-china/united-arab-emirates/">Macau, China vs United Arab Emirates: Fruit consumption vs. GDP per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruit consumption vs. GDP per capita
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.