Estonia vs Syria: Fruit consumption vs. GDP per capita
Estonia
81.87 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Syria
80.74 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Estonia rank
98th
Syria rank
100th
Fruit consumption vs. GDP per capita over time
- Estonia
- Syria
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 81.87 kilograms per year per capita against 80.74 kilograms per year per capita in Syria, a difference of 1.13 kilograms per year per capita.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 98th and Syria ranks 100th of 192 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 1 and Syria in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Syria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 82.77 kilograms per year per capita | 87.23 kilograms per year per capita | 4.46 kilograms per year per capita | Syria |
| 2020s | 87.06 kilograms per year per capita | 82.36 kilograms per year per capita | 4.7 kilograms per year per capita | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fruit consumption vs. gdp per capita, Estonia or Syria?
- Estonia, at 81.87 kilograms per year per capita against 80.74 kilograms per year per capita in Syria as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fruit consumption vs. gdp per capita between Estonia and Syria?
- 1.13 kilograms per year per capita, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Syria?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and Syria rank globally for fruit consumption vs. gdp per capita?
- Estonia ranks 98th and Syria ranks 100th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Fruit consumption vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.