Egypt vs Naoero: Fruit consumption vs. GDP per capita
Egypt
94.03 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Naoero
93.72 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Egypt rank
77th
Naoero rank
78th
Fruit consumption vs. GDP per capita over time
- Egypt
- Naoero
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 94.03 kilograms per year per capita against 93.72 kilograms per year per capita in Naoero, a difference of 0.31 kilograms per year per capita.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2019 it was Egypt ahead.
Egypt ranks 77th and Naoero ranks 78th of 192 countries.
Egypt has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Naoero | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 84.7 kilograms per year per capita | 67.84 kilograms per year per capita | 16.86 kilograms per year per capita | Egypt |
| 2020s | 88.47 kilograms per year per capita | 84.13 kilograms per year per capita | 4.34 kilograms per year per capita | Egypt |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fruit consumption vs. gdp per capita, Egypt or Naoero?
- Egypt, at 94.03 kilograms per year per capita against 93.72 kilograms per year per capita in Naoero as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fruit consumption vs. gdp per capita between Egypt and Naoero?
- 0.31 kilograms per year per capita, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Naoero?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2023.
- How do Egypt and Naoero rank globally for fruit consumption vs. gdp per capita?
- Egypt ranks 77th and Naoero ranks 78th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Fruit consumption vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.