Antigua and Barbuda vs Uganda: Fruit consumption vs. GDP per capita

Antigua and Barbuda
241.7 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Uganda
207.61 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Antigua and Barbuda rank
5th
Uganda rank
7th

Fruit consumption vs. GDP per capita over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Uganda
100150200250300196119922023

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 241.7 kilograms per year per capita against 207.61 kilograms per year per capita in Uganda, a difference of 34.09 kilograms per year per capita.

That makes Antigua and Barbuda's figure about 1.2 times Uganda's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uganda ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 5th and Uganda ranks 7th of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 3 and Uganda in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 115.47 kilograms per year per capita 133.66 kilograms per year per capita 18.19 kilograms per year per capita Uganda
1970s 118.78 kilograms per year per capita 131.72 kilograms per year per capita 12.94 kilograms per year per capita Uganda
1980s 154.39 kilograms per year per capita 189.59 kilograms per year per capita 35.2 kilograms per year per capita Uganda
1990s 159.98 kilograms per year per capita 209.45 kilograms per year per capita 49.46 kilograms per year per capita Uganda
2000s 182.7 kilograms per year per capita 177.49 kilograms per year per capita 5.21 kilograms per year per capita Antigua and Barbuda
2010s 208.24 kilograms per year per capita 132.12 kilograms per year per capita 76.12 kilograms per year per capita Antigua and Barbuda
2020s 219.53 kilograms per year per capita 218.47 kilograms per year per capita 1.07 kilograms per year per capita Antigua and Barbuda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit consumption vs. gdp per capita, Antigua and Barbuda or Uganda?
Antigua and Barbuda, at 241.7 kilograms per year per capita against 207.61 kilograms per year per capita in Uganda as of 2023.
What is the difference in fruit consumption vs. gdp per capita between Antigua and Barbuda and Uganda?
34.09 kilograms per year per capita, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Uganda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Uganda rank globally for fruit consumption vs. gdp per capita?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 5th and Uganda ranks 7th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Fruit consumption vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Uganda: Fruit consumption vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-consumption-vs-gdp-per-capita/antigua-and-barbuda/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-consumption-vs-gdp-per-capita/antigua-and-barbuda/uganda/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Uganda: Fruit consumption vs. GDP per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruit consumption vs. GDP per capita
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.