Antigua and Barbuda vs Guyana: Fruit consumption vs. GDP per capita

Antigua and Barbuda
241.7 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Guyana
345.9 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Antigua and Barbuda rank
5th
Guyana rank
3rd

Fruit consumption vs. GDP per capita over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Guyana
0100200300196119922023

How they compare

Guyana currently reports 345.9 kilograms per year per capita against 241.7 kilograms per year per capita in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 104.2 kilograms per year per capita.

That makes Guyana's figure about 1.4 times Antigua and Barbuda's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 5th and Guyana ranks 3rd of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 6 and Guyana in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Guyana Difference Ahead
1960s 115.47 kilograms per year per capita 59.75 kilograms per year per capita 55.72 kilograms per year per capita Antigua and Barbuda
1970s 118.78 kilograms per year per capita 50.3 kilograms per year per capita 68.48 kilograms per year per capita Antigua and Barbuda
1980s 154.39 kilograms per year per capita 54.69 kilograms per year per capita 99.7 kilograms per year per capita Antigua and Barbuda
1990s 159.98 kilograms per year per capita 61.66 kilograms per year per capita 98.32 kilograms per year per capita Antigua and Barbuda
2000s 182.7 kilograms per year per capita 56.55 kilograms per year per capita 126.15 kilograms per year per capita Antigua and Barbuda
2010s 208.24 kilograms per year per capita 155.39 kilograms per year per capita 52.84 kilograms per year per capita Antigua and Barbuda
2020s 219.53 kilograms per year per capita 314.54 kilograms per year per capita 95 kilograms per year per capita Guyana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit consumption vs. gdp per capita, Antigua and Barbuda or Guyana?
Guyana, at 345.9 kilograms per year per capita against 241.7 kilograms per year per capita in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2023.
What is the difference in fruit consumption vs. gdp per capita between Antigua and Barbuda and Guyana?
104.2 kilograms per year per capita, with Guyana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Guyana?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Guyana rank globally for fruit consumption vs. gdp per capita?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 5th and Guyana ranks 3rd of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Fruit consumption vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Guyana: Fruit consumption vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-consumption-vs-gdp-per-capita/antigua-and-barbuda/guyana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-consumption-vs-gdp-per-capita/antigua-and-barbuda/guyana/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Guyana: Fruit consumption vs. GDP per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruit consumption vs. GDP per capita
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.