Angola vs Syria: Fruit consumption vs. GDP per capita
Angola
82.42 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Syria
80.74 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Angola rank
97th
Syria rank
100th
Fruit consumption vs. GDP per capita over time
- Angola
- Syria
How they compare
Angola currently reports 82.42 kilograms per year per capita against 80.74 kilograms per year per capita in Syria, a difference of 1.68 kilograms per year per capita.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Syria ahead.
Angola ranks 97th and Syria ranks 100th of 192 countries.
Syria has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Syria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 67.84 kilograms per year per capita | 87.23 kilograms per year per capita | 19.39 kilograms per year per capita | Syria |
| 2020s | 77.34 kilograms per year per capita | 82.36 kilograms per year per capita | 5.02 kilograms per year per capita | Syria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fruit consumption vs. gdp per capita, Angola or Syria?
- Angola, at 82.42 kilograms per year per capita against 80.74 kilograms per year per capita in Syria as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fruit consumption vs. gdp per capita between Angola and Syria?
- 1.68 kilograms per year per capita, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Syria?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Angola and Syria rank globally for fruit consumption vs. gdp per capita?
- Angola ranks 97th and Syria ranks 100th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Fruit consumption vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.