Lithuania vs Sudan: Fruit consumption per capita
Lithuania
58.04 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Sudan
59.83 kilograms per year per capita
in 2022
Lithuania rank
141st
Sudan rank
138th
Fruit consumption per capita over time
- Lithuania
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 59.83 kilograms per year per capita against 58.04 kilograms per year per capita in Lithuania, a difference of 1.79 kilograms per year per capita.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.
Lithuania ranks 141st and Sudan ranks 138th of 191 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 52.3 kilograms per year per capita | 65.78 kilograms per year per capita | 13.48 kilograms per year per capita | Sudan |
| 2020s | 59.44 kilograms per year per capita | 60.12 kilograms per year per capita | 0.6871 kilograms per year per capita | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fruit consumption per capita, Lithuania or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 59.83 kilograms per year per capita against 58.04 kilograms per year per capita in Lithuania as of 2022.
- What is the difference in fruit consumption per capita between Lithuania and Sudan?
- 1.79 kilograms per year per capita, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Sudan?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2022.
- How do Lithuania and Sudan rank globally for fruit consumption per capita?
- Lithuania ranks 141st and Sudan ranks 138th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Fruit consumption per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.