Libya vs Sweden: Fruit consumption per capita
Libya
89.94 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Sweden
86.97 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Libya rank
85th
Sweden rank
88th
Fruit consumption per capita over time
- Libya
- Sweden
How they compare
Libya currently reports 89.94 kilograms per year per capita against 86.97 kilograms per year per capita in Sweden, a difference of 2.97 kilograms per year per capita.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Libya ahead.
Libya ranks 85th and Sweden ranks 88th of 191 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 93.74 kilograms per year per capita | 116.66 kilograms per year per capita | 22.92 kilograms per year per capita | Sweden |
| 2020s | 85.84 kilograms per year per capita | 93.75 kilograms per year per capita | 7.91 kilograms per year per capita | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fruit consumption per capita, Libya or Sweden?
- Libya, at 89.94 kilograms per year per capita against 86.97 kilograms per year per capita in Sweden as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fruit consumption per capita between Libya and Sweden?
- 2.97 kilograms per year per capita, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Sweden?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Libya and Sweden rank globally for fruit consumption per capita?
- Libya ranks 85th and Sweden ranks 88th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Fruit consumption per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.