Guatemala vs Qatar: Fruit consumption per capita
Guatemala
69.75 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Qatar
71.22 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Guatemala rank
120th
Qatar rank
119th
Fruit consumption per capita over time
- Guatemala
- Qatar
How they compare
Qatar currently reports 71.22 kilograms per year per capita against 69.75 kilograms per year per capita in Guatemala, a difference of 1.47 kilograms per year per capita.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2019 it was Qatar ahead.
Guatemala ranks 120th and Qatar ranks 119th of 192 countries.
Qatar has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 67.86 kilograms per year per capita | 90.35 kilograms per year per capita | 22.49 kilograms per year per capita | Qatar |
| 2020s | 89.59 kilograms per year per capita | 91.67 kilograms per year per capita | 2.08 kilograms per year per capita | Qatar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fruit consumption per capita, Guatemala or Qatar?
- Qatar, at 71.22 kilograms per year per capita against 69.75 kilograms per year per capita in Guatemala as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fruit consumption per capita between Guatemala and Qatar?
- 1.47 kilograms per year per capita, with Qatar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Qatar?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2023.
- How do Guatemala and Qatar rank globally for fruit consumption per capita?
- Guatemala ranks 120th and Qatar ranks 119th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Fruit consumption per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.