Chad vs Somalia: Fruit consumption per capita
Chad
7.17 kilograms per year per capita
in 2022
Somalia
15.1 kilograms per year per capita
in 2022
Chad rank
190th
Somalia rank
187th
Fruit consumption per capita over time
- Chad
- Somalia
How they compare
Somalia currently reports 15.1 kilograms per year per capita against 7.17 kilograms per year per capita in Chad, a difference of 7.93 kilograms per year per capita.
That makes Somalia's figure about 2.1 times Chad's.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Somalia has been ahead every year.
Chad ranks 190th and Somalia ranks 187th of 192 countries.
Somalia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Somalia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 8.04 kilograms per year per capita | 17.12 kilograms per year per capita | 9.09 kilograms per year per capita | Somalia |
| 2020s | 7.15 kilograms per year per capita | 16.07 kilograms per year per capita | 8.92 kilograms per year per capita | Somalia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fruit consumption per capita, Chad or Somalia?
- Somalia, at 15.1 kilograms per year per capita against 7.17 kilograms per year per capita in Chad as of 2022.
- What is the difference in fruit consumption per capita between Chad and Somalia?
- 7.93 kilograms per year per capita, with Somalia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Somalia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Chad and Somalia rank globally for fruit consumption per capita?
- Chad ranks 190th and Somalia ranks 187th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Fruit consumption per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.