Albania vs Sao Tome and Principe: Fruit consumption per capita

Albania
185.68 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
192.14 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Albania rank
11th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
10th

Fruit consumption per capita over time

  • Albania
  • Sao Tome and Principe
050100150200250196119922023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 192.14 kilograms per year per capita against 185.68 kilograms per year per capita in Albania, a difference of 6.46 kilograms per year per capita.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Albania ranks 11th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 10th of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Albania averaged higher in 1 and Sao Tome and Principe in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Albania Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 44.13 kilograms per year per capita 50.61 kilograms per year per capita 6.49 kilograms per year per capita Sao Tome and Principe
1970s 42.83 kilograms per year per capita 32.04 kilograms per year per capita 10.78 kilograms per year per capita Albania
1980s 41.8 kilograms per year per capita 53.54 kilograms per year per capita 11.74 kilograms per year per capita Sao Tome and Principe
1990s 39.94 kilograms per year per capita 111.86 kilograms per year per capita 71.92 kilograms per year per capita Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 105.13 kilograms per year per capita 164.68 kilograms per year per capita 59.55 kilograms per year per capita Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 165.84 kilograms per year per capita 211 kilograms per year per capita 45.16 kilograms per year per capita Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 192.47 kilograms per year per capita 198.81 kilograms per year per capita 6.34 kilograms per year per capita Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit consumption per capita, Albania or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 192.14 kilograms per year per capita against 185.68 kilograms per year per capita in Albania as of 2023.
What is the difference in fruit consumption per capita between Albania and Sao Tome and Principe?
6.46 kilograms per year per capita, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Sao Tome and Principe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Albania and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for fruit consumption per capita?
Albania ranks 11th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 10th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Fruit consumption per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Albania vs Sao Tome and Principe: Fruit consumption per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-consumption-per-capita/albania/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-consumption-per-capita/albania/sao-tome-and-principe/">Albania vs Sao Tome and Principe: Fruit consumption per capita</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruit consumption per capita
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.