East Timor vs Uganda: Fruit consumption by type
East Timor
0 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Uganda
0 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
East Timor rank
140th
Uganda rank
140th
Fruit consumption by type over time
- East Timor
- Uganda
How they compare
East Timor currently reports 0 kilograms per year per capita against 0 kilograms per year per capita in Uganda, a difference of 0 kilograms per year per capita.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Uganda has been ahead every year.
East Timor ranks 140th and Uganda ranks 140th of 184 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | East Timor | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 kilograms per year per capita | 0.005 kilograms per year per capita | 0.005 kilograms per year per capita | Uganda |
| 2020s | 0 kilograms per year per capita | 0.005 kilograms per year per capita | 0.005 kilograms per year per capita | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fruit consumption by type, East Timor or Uganda?
- East Timor, at 0 kilograms per year per capita against 0 kilograms per year per capita in Uganda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fruit consumption by type between East Timor and Uganda?
- 0 kilograms per year per capita, with East Timor ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for East Timor and Uganda?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
- How do East Timor and Uganda rank globally for fruit consumption by type?
- East Timor ranks 140th and Uganda ranks 140th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Fruit consumption by type. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.