Sudan vs Tunisia: Fruit consumption by type
Sudan
8 kilograms per year per capita
in 2022
Tunisia
11.77 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Sudan rank
11th
Tunisia rank
8th
Fruit consumption by type over time
- Sudan
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 11.77 kilograms per year per capita against 8 kilograms per year per capita in Sudan, a difference of 3.77 kilograms per year per capita.
That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.5 times Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.
Sudan ranks 11th and Tunisia ranks 8th of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Sudan averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sudan | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 9.53 kilograms per year per capita | 5.8 kilograms per year per capita | 3.74 kilograms per year per capita | Sudan |
| 2020s | 8.47 kilograms per year per capita | 10.45 kilograms per year per capita | 1.98 kilograms per year per capita | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fruit consumption by type, Sudan or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 11.77 kilograms per year per capita against 8 kilograms per year per capita in Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fruit consumption by type between Sudan and Tunisia?
- 3.77 kilograms per year per capita, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Tunisia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2022.
- How do Sudan and Tunisia rank globally for fruit consumption by type?
- Sudan ranks 11th and Tunisia ranks 8th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Fruit consumption by type. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.