Seychelles vs Zambia: Fruit consumption by type
Seychelles
0 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Zambia
0 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Seychelles rank
141st
Zambia rank
141st
Fruit consumption by type over time
- Seychelles
- Zambia
How they compare
Seychelles currently reports 0 kilograms per year per capita against 0 kilograms per year per capita in Zambia, a difference of 0 kilograms per year per capita.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Zambia ahead.
Seychelles ranks 141st and Zambia ranks 141st of 185 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Seychelles averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Seychelles | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 kilograms per year per capita | 0.005 kilograms per year per capita | 0.005 kilograms per year per capita | Zambia |
| 2020s | 0.2425 kilograms per year per capita | 0 kilograms per year per capita | 0.2425 kilograms per year per capita | Seychelles |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fruit consumption by type, Seychelles or Zambia?
- Seychelles, at 0 kilograms per year per capita against 0 kilograms per year per capita in Zambia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fruit consumption by type between Seychelles and Zambia?
- 0 kilograms per year per capita, with Seychelles ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Seychelles and Zambia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Seychelles and Zambia rank globally for fruit consumption by type?
- Seychelles ranks 141st and Zambia ranks 141st of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Fruit consumption by type. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.