Samoa vs Vietnam: Fruit consumption by type
Samoa
0 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Vietnam
0 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Samoa rank
140th
Vietnam rank
140th
Fruit consumption by type over time
- Samoa
- Vietnam
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 0 kilograms per year per capita against 0 kilograms per year per capita in Vietnam, a difference of 0 kilograms per year per capita.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Vietnam ahead.
Samoa ranks 140th and Vietnam ranks 140th of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Samoa averaged higher in 1 and Vietnam in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Samoa | Vietnam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.006 kilograms per year per capita | 0 kilograms per year per capita | 0.006 kilograms per year per capita | Samoa |
| 2020s | 0.005 kilograms per year per capita | 0.005 kilograms per year per capita | 0 kilograms per year per capita | Vietnam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fruit consumption by type, Samoa or Vietnam?
- Samoa, at 0 kilograms per year per capita against 0 kilograms per year per capita in Vietnam as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fruit consumption by type between Samoa and Vietnam?
- 0 kilograms per year per capita, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Samoa and Vietnam?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Samoa and Vietnam rank globally for fruit consumption by type?
- Samoa ranks 140th and Vietnam ranks 140th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Fruit consumption by type. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.