Samoa vs East Timor: Fruit consumption by type
Samoa
0 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
East Timor
0 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Samoa rank
140th
East Timor rank
140th
Fruit consumption by type over time
- Samoa
- East Timor
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 0 kilograms per year per capita against 0 kilograms per year per capita in East Timor, a difference of 0 kilograms per year per capita.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2014 it was East Timor ahead.
Samoa ranks 140th and East Timor ranks 140th of 184 countries.
Samoa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Samoa | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.01 kilograms per year per capita | 0 kilograms per year per capita | 0.01 kilograms per year per capita | Samoa |
| 2020s | 0.005 kilograms per year per capita | 0 kilograms per year per capita | 0.005 kilograms per year per capita | Samoa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fruit consumption by type, Samoa or East Timor?
- Samoa, at 0 kilograms per year per capita against 0 kilograms per year per capita in East Timor as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fruit consumption by type between Samoa and East Timor?
- 0 kilograms per year per capita, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Samoa and East Timor?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
- How do Samoa and East Timor rank globally for fruit consumption by type?
- Samoa ranks 140th and East Timor ranks 140th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Fruit consumption by type. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.