Rwanda vs Seychelles: Fruit consumption by type
Rwanda
0 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Seychelles
0 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Rwanda rank
141st
Seychelles rank
141st
Fruit consumption by type over time
- Rwanda
- Seychelles
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 0 kilograms per year per capita against 0 kilograms per year per capita in Seychelles, a difference of 0 kilograms per year per capita.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Seychelles ahead.
Rwanda ranks 141st and Seychelles ranks 141st of 185 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 1 and Seychelles in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Seychelles | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.002 kilograms per year per capita | 0 kilograms per year per capita | 0.002 kilograms per year per capita | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 0 kilograms per year per capita | 0.2425 kilograms per year per capita | 0.2425 kilograms per year per capita | Seychelles |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fruit consumption by type, Rwanda or Seychelles?
- Rwanda, at 0 kilograms per year per capita against 0 kilograms per year per capita in Seychelles as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fruit consumption by type between Rwanda and Seychelles?
- 0 kilograms per year per capita, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Seychelles?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Rwanda and Seychelles rank globally for fruit consumption by type?
- Rwanda ranks 141st and Seychelles ranks 141st of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Fruit consumption by type. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.