Nigeria vs Samoa: Fruit consumption by type
Nigeria
0 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Samoa
0 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Nigeria rank
141st
Samoa rank
141st
Fruit consumption by type over time
- Nigeria
- Samoa
How they compare
Nigeria currently reports 0 kilograms per year per capita against 0 kilograms per year per capita in Samoa, a difference of 0 kilograms per year per capita.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Samoa ahead.
Nigeria ranks 141st and Samoa ranks 141st of 185 countries.
Nigeria has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nigeria | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.016 kilograms per year per capita | 0.006 kilograms per year per capita | 0.01 kilograms per year per capita | Nigeria |
| 2020s | 0.01 kilograms per year per capita | 0.005 kilograms per year per capita | 0.005 kilograms per year per capita | Nigeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fruit consumption by type, Nigeria or Samoa?
- Nigeria, at 0 kilograms per year per capita against 0 kilograms per year per capita in Samoa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fruit consumption by type between Nigeria and Samoa?
- 0 kilograms per year per capita, with Nigeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nigeria and Samoa?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Nigeria and Samoa rank globally for fruit consumption by type?
- Nigeria ranks 141st and Samoa ranks 141st of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Fruit consumption by type. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.