Mozambique vs Nepal: Fruit consumption by type
Mozambique
0.01 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Nepal
0.01 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Mozambique rank
131st
Nepal rank
133rd
Fruit consumption by type over time
- Mozambique
- Nepal
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 0.01 kilograms per year per capita against 0.01 kilograms per year per capita in Nepal, a difference of 0 kilograms per year per capita.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Nepal ahead.
Mozambique ranks 131st and Nepal ranks 133rd of 184 countries.
Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mozambique | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.007 kilograms per year per capita | 0.049 kilograms per year per capita | 0.042 kilograms per year per capita | Nepal |
| 2020s | 0.0075 kilograms per year per capita | 0.085 kilograms per year per capita | 0.0775 kilograms per year per capita | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fruit consumption by type, Mozambique or Nepal?
- Mozambique, at 0.01 kilograms per year per capita against 0.01 kilograms per year per capita in Nepal as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fruit consumption by type between Mozambique and Nepal?
- 0 kilograms per year per capita, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Nepal?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Mozambique and Nepal rank globally for fruit consumption by type?
- Mozambique ranks 131st and Nepal ranks 133rd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Fruit consumption by type. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.