Mexico vs East Timor: Fruit consumption by type
Mexico
0 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
East Timor
0 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Mexico rank
140th
East Timor rank
140th
Fruit consumption by type over time
- Mexico
- East Timor
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 0 kilograms per year per capita against 0 kilograms per year per capita in East Timor, a difference of 0 kilograms per year per capita.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Mexico ahead.
Mexico ranks 140th and East Timor ranks 140th of 184 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0483 kilograms per year per capita | 0 kilograms per year per capita | 0.0483 kilograms per year per capita | Mexico |
| 2020s | 0.0475 kilograms per year per capita | 0 kilograms per year per capita | 0.0475 kilograms per year per capita | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fruit consumption by type, Mexico or East Timor?
- Mexico, at 0 kilograms per year per capita against 0 kilograms per year per capita in East Timor as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fruit consumption by type between Mexico and East Timor?
- 0 kilograms per year per capita, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and East Timor?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
- How do Mexico and East Timor rank globally for fruit consumption by type?
- Mexico ranks 140th and East Timor ranks 140th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Fruit consumption by type. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.