Mauritania vs Sudan: Fruit consumption by type
Mauritania
5.01 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Sudan
8 kilograms per year per capita
in 2022
Mauritania rank
13th
Sudan rank
11th
Fruit consumption by type over time
- Mauritania
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 8 kilograms per year per capita against 5.01 kilograms per year per capita in Mauritania, a difference of 2.99 kilograms per year per capita.
That makes Sudan's figure about 1.6 times Mauritania's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
Mauritania ranks 13th and Sudan ranks 11th of 184 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritania | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 5.62 kilograms per year per capita | 9.53 kilograms per year per capita | 3.91 kilograms per year per capita | Sudan |
| 2020s | 5.1 kilograms per year per capita | 8.47 kilograms per year per capita | 3.37 kilograms per year per capita | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fruit consumption by type, Mauritania or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 8 kilograms per year per capita against 5.01 kilograms per year per capita in Mauritania as of 2022.
- What is the difference in fruit consumption by type between Mauritania and Sudan?
- 2.99 kilograms per year per capita, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Sudan?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2022.
- How do Mauritania and Sudan rank globally for fruit consumption by type?
- Mauritania ranks 13th and Sudan ranks 11th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Fruit consumption by type. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.