Madagascar vs Seychelles: Fruit consumption by type
Madagascar
0 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Seychelles
0 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Madagascar rank
140th
Seychelles rank
140th
Fruit consumption by type over time
- Madagascar
- Seychelles
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 0 kilograms per year per capita against 0 kilograms per year per capita in Seychelles, a difference of 0 kilograms per year per capita.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Seychelles has been ahead every year.
Madagascar ranks 140th and Seychelles ranks 140th of 184 countries.
Seychelles has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar | Seychelles | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 kilograms per year per capita | 0 kilograms per year per capita | 0 kilograms per year per capita | — |
| 2020s | 0 kilograms per year per capita | 0.2425 kilograms per year per capita | 0.2425 kilograms per year per capita | Seychelles |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fruit consumption by type, Madagascar or Seychelles?
- Madagascar, at 0 kilograms per year per capita against 0 kilograms per year per capita in Seychelles as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fruit consumption by type between Madagascar and Seychelles?
- 0 kilograms per year per capita, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Seychelles?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Madagascar and Seychelles rank globally for fruit consumption by type?
- Madagascar ranks 140th and Seychelles ranks 140th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Fruit consumption by type. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.