Libya vs Qatar: Fruit consumption by type
Libya
14.29 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Qatar
13.04 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Libya rank
6th
Qatar rank
7th
Fruit consumption by type over time
- Libya
- Qatar
How they compare
Libya currently reports 14.29 kilograms per year per capita against 13.04 kilograms per year per capita in Qatar, a difference of 1.25 kilograms per year per capita.
That makes Libya's figure about 1.1 times Qatar's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Libya has been ahead every year.
Libya ranks 6th and Qatar ranks 7th of 185 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 14.57 kilograms per year per capita | 11.46 kilograms per year per capita | 3.11 kilograms per year per capita | Libya |
| 2020s | 14.37 kilograms per year per capita | 12.3 kilograms per year per capita | 2.07 kilograms per year per capita | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fruit consumption by type, Libya or Qatar?
- Libya, at 14.29 kilograms per year per capita against 13.04 kilograms per year per capita in Qatar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fruit consumption by type between Libya and Qatar?
- 1.25 kilograms per year per capita, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Qatar?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2023.
- How do Libya and Qatar rank globally for fruit consumption by type?
- Libya ranks 6th and Qatar ranks 7th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Fruit consumption by type. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.