Lesotho vs Uruguay: Fruit consumption by type
Lesotho
0.03 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Uruguay
0.03 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Lesotho rank
108th
Uruguay rank
107th
Fruit consumption by type over time
- Lesotho
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 0.03 kilograms per year per capita against 0.03 kilograms per year per capita in Lesotho, a difference of 0 kilograms per year per capita.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Lesotho ahead.
Lesotho ranks 108th and Uruguay ranks 107th of 185 countries.
Lesotho has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.1367 kilograms per year per capita | 0.0167 kilograms per year per capita | 0.12 kilograms per year per capita | Lesotho |
| 2020s | 0.03 kilograms per year per capita | 0.0275 kilograms per year per capita | 0.0025 kilograms per year per capita | Lesotho |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fruit consumption by type, Lesotho or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 0.03 kilograms per year per capita against 0.03 kilograms per year per capita in Lesotho as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fruit consumption by type between Lesotho and Uruguay?
- 0 kilograms per year per capita, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Uruguay?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
- How do Lesotho and Uruguay rank globally for fruit consumption by type?
- Lesotho ranks 108th and Uruguay ranks 107th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Fruit consumption by type. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.