Lesotho vs Mali: Fruit consumption by type
Lesotho
0.03 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Mali
0.0294 kilograms per year per capita
in 2022
Lesotho rank
108th
Mali rank
111th
Fruit consumption by type over time
- Lesotho
- Mali
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 0.03 kilograms per year per capita against 0.0294 kilograms per year per capita in Mali, a difference of 0.0006 kilograms per year per capita.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Lesotho ahead.
Lesotho ranks 108th and Mali ranks 111th of 184 countries.
Lesotho has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.1367 kilograms per year per capita | 0.0797 kilograms per year per capita | 0.057 kilograms per year per capita | Lesotho |
| 2020s | 0.03 kilograms per year per capita | 0.0294 kilograms per year per capita | 0.0006 kilograms per year per capita | Lesotho |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fruit consumption by type, Lesotho or Mali?
- Lesotho, at 0.03 kilograms per year per capita against 0.0294 kilograms per year per capita in Mali as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fruit consumption by type between Lesotho and Mali?
- 0.0006 kilograms per year per capita, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Mali?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2022.
- How do Lesotho and Mali rank globally for fruit consumption by type?
- Lesotho ranks 108th and Mali ranks 111th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Fruit consumption by type. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.