South Korea vs Samoa: Fruit consumption by type
South Korea
0 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Samoa
0 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
South Korea rank
140th
Samoa rank
140th
Fruit consumption by type over time
- South Korea
- Samoa
How they compare
South Korea currently reports 0 kilograms per year per capita against 0 kilograms per year per capita in Samoa, a difference of 0 kilograms per year per capita.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Samoa ahead.
South Korea ranks 140th and Samoa ranks 140th of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, South Korea averaged higher in 1 and Samoa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Korea | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.004 kilograms per year per capita | 0.006 kilograms per year per capita | 0.002 kilograms per year per capita | Samoa |
| 2020s | 0.0075 kilograms per year per capita | 0.005 kilograms per year per capita | 0.0025 kilograms per year per capita | South Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fruit consumption by type, South Korea or Samoa?
- South Korea, at 0 kilograms per year per capita against 0 kilograms per year per capita in Samoa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fruit consumption by type between South Korea and Samoa?
- 0 kilograms per year per capita, with South Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Samoa?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do South Korea and Samoa rank globally for fruit consumption by type?
- South Korea ranks 140th and Samoa ranks 140th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Fruit consumption by type. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.