Iran vs Sudan: Fruit consumption by type
Iran
7.07 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Sudan
8 kilograms per year per capita
in 2022
Iran rank
12th
Sudan rank
11th
Fruit consumption by type over time
- Iran
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 8 kilograms per year per capita against 7.07 kilograms per year per capita in Iran, a difference of 0.93 kilograms per year per capita.
That makes Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Iran's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Iran ahead.
Iran ranks 12th and Sudan ranks 11th of 184 countries.
Iran has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iran | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 10.31 kilograms per year per capita | 9.53 kilograms per year per capita | 0.7783 kilograms per year per capita | Iran |
| 2020s | 8.81 kilograms per year per capita | 8.47 kilograms per year per capita | 0.3361 kilograms per year per capita | Iran |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fruit consumption by type, Iran or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 8 kilograms per year per capita against 7.07 kilograms per year per capita in Iran as of 2022.
- What is the difference in fruit consumption by type between Iran and Sudan?
- 0.93 kilograms per year per capita, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iran and Sudan?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2022.
- How do Iran and Sudan rank globally for fruit consumption by type?
- Iran ranks 12th and Sudan ranks 11th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Fruit consumption by type. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.