Honduras vs Suriname: Fruit consumption by type
Honduras
0.01 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Suriname
0.01 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Honduras rank
136th
Suriname rank
139th
Fruit consumption by type over time
- Honduras
- Suriname
How they compare
Honduras currently reports 0.01 kilograms per year per capita against 0.01 kilograms per year per capita in Suriname, a difference of 0 kilograms per year per capita.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Honduras ahead.
Honduras ranks 136th and Suriname ranks 139th of 185 countries.
Honduras has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.045 kilograms per year per capita | 0.02 kilograms per year per capita | 0.025 kilograms per year per capita | Honduras |
| 2020s | 0.065 kilograms per year per capita | 0.0175 kilograms per year per capita | 0.0475 kilograms per year per capita | Honduras |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fruit consumption by type, Honduras or Suriname?
- Honduras, at 0.01 kilograms per year per capita against 0.01 kilograms per year per capita in Suriname as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fruit consumption by type between Honduras and Suriname?
- 0 kilograms per year per capita, with Honduras ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Suriname?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2023.
- How do Honduras and Suriname rank globally for fruit consumption by type?
- Honduras ranks 136th and Suriname ranks 139th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Fruit consumption by type. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.