Guinea-Bissau vs Samoa: Fruit consumption by type
Guinea-Bissau
0.01 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Samoa
0 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau rank
137th
Samoa rank
140th
Fruit consumption by type over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Samoa
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 0.01 kilograms per year per capita against 0 kilograms per year per capita in Samoa, a difference of 0.01 kilograms per year per capita.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Samoa ahead.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 137th and Samoa ranks 140th of 184 countries.
Samoa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.006 kilograms per year per capita | 0.008 kilograms per year per capita | 0.002 kilograms per year per capita | Samoa |
| 2020s | 0.0025 kilograms per year per capita | 0.005 kilograms per year per capita | 0.0025 kilograms per year per capita | Samoa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fruit consumption by type, Guinea-Bissau or Samoa?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 0.01 kilograms per year per capita against 0 kilograms per year per capita in Samoa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fruit consumption by type between Guinea-Bissau and Samoa?
- 0.01 kilograms per year per capita, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Samoa?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Samoa rank globally for fruit consumption by type?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 137th and Samoa ranks 140th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Fruit consumption by type. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.