Congo vs Kiribati: Fruit consumption by type
Congo
0 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Kiribati
0 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Congo rank
140th
Kiribati rank
140th
Fruit consumption by type over time
- Congo
- Kiribati
How they compare
Congo currently reports 0 kilograms per year per capita against 0 kilograms per year per capita in Kiribati, a difference of 0 kilograms per year per capita.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Kiribati ahead.
Congo ranks 140th and Kiribati ranks 140th of 184 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.01 kilograms per year per capita | 0 kilograms per year per capita | 0.01 kilograms per year per capita | Congo |
| 2020s | 0.0067 kilograms per year per capita | 0 kilograms per year per capita | 0.0067 kilograms per year per capita | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fruit consumption by type, Congo or Kiribati?
- Congo, at 0 kilograms per year per capita against 0 kilograms per year per capita in Kiribati as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fruit consumption by type between Congo and Kiribati?
- 0 kilograms per year per capita, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Kiribati?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Kiribati rank globally for fruit consumption by type?
- Congo ranks 140th and Kiribati ranks 140th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Fruit consumption by type. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.