Comoros vs Russia: Fruit consumption by type
Comoros
0.07 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Russia
0.08 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Comoros rank
96th
Russia rank
93rd
Fruit consumption by type over time
- Comoros
- Russia
How they compare
Russia currently reports 0.08 kilograms per year per capita against 0.07 kilograms per year per capita in Comoros, a difference of 0.01 kilograms per year per capita.
That makes Russia's figure about 1.1 times Comoros's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Russia ahead.
Comoros ranks 96th and Russia ranks 93rd of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Comoros averaged higher in 1 and Russia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Russia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.115 kilograms per year per capita | 0.13 kilograms per year per capita | 0.015 kilograms per year per capita | Russia |
| 2020s | 0.11 kilograms per year per capita | 0.0775 kilograms per year per capita | 0.0325 kilograms per year per capita | Comoros |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fruit consumption by type, Comoros or Russia?
- Russia, at 0.08 kilograms per year per capita against 0.07 kilograms per year per capita in Comoros as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fruit consumption by type between Comoros and Russia?
- 0.01 kilograms per year per capita, with Russia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Russia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Comoros and Russia rank globally for fruit consumption by type?
- Comoros ranks 96th and Russia ranks 93rd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Fruit consumption by type. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.