Chile vs Suriname: Fruit consumption by type
Chile
0 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Suriname
0.01 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Chile rank
140th
Suriname rank
138th
Fruit consumption by type over time
- Chile
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 0.01 kilograms per year per capita against 0 kilograms per year per capita in Chile, a difference of 0.01 kilograms per year per capita.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Suriname ahead.
Chile ranks 140th and Suriname ranks 138th of 184 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.01 kilograms per year per capita | 0.02 kilograms per year per capita | 0.01 kilograms per year per capita | Suriname |
| 2020s | 0.0125 kilograms per year per capita | 0.0175 kilograms per year per capita | 0.005 kilograms per year per capita | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fruit consumption by type, Chile or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 0.01 kilograms per year per capita against 0 kilograms per year per capita in Chile as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fruit consumption by type between Chile and Suriname?
- 0.01 kilograms per year per capita, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Suriname?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2023.
- How do Chile and Suriname rank globally for fruit consumption by type?
- Chile ranks 140th and Suriname ranks 138th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Fruit consumption by type. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.