Chad vs Somalia: Fruit consumption by type
Chad
1.04 kilograms per year per capita
in 2022
Somalia
1.52 kilograms per year per capita
in 2022
Chad rank
28th
Somalia rank
25th
Fruit consumption by type over time
- Chad
- Somalia
How they compare
Somalia currently reports 1.52 kilograms per year per capita against 1.04 kilograms per year per capita in Chad, a difference of 0.48 kilograms per year per capita.
That makes Somalia's figure about 1.5 times Chad's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Chad ahead.
Chad ranks 28th and Somalia ranks 25th of 184 countries.
Somalia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Somalia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.27 kilograms per year per capita | 1.53 kilograms per year per capita | 0.2603 kilograms per year per capita | Somalia |
| 2020s | 1.08 kilograms per year per capita | 1.96 kilograms per year per capita | 0.8811 kilograms per year per capita | Somalia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fruit consumption by type, Chad or Somalia?
- Somalia, at 1.52 kilograms per year per capita against 1.04 kilograms per year per capita in Chad as of 2022.
- What is the difference in fruit consumption by type between Chad and Somalia?
- 0.48 kilograms per year per capita, with Somalia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Somalia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Chad and Somalia rank globally for fruit consumption by type?
- Chad ranks 28th and Somalia ranks 25th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Fruit consumption by type. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.