What is the difference in fruit consumption by type between Central African Republic and USSR?

0.009 kilograms per year per capita, with USSR ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and USSR?

31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.

Where does this data come from?

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Fruit consumption by type. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Central African Republic vs USSR: Fruit consumption by type

Central African Republic

0.0109 kilograms per year per capita

in 2022

USSR

0.0199 kilograms per year per capita

in 1991

Central African Republic rank

122nd

USSR rank

119th

Fruit consumption by type over time

Central African Republic
USSR

How they compare

USSR currently reports 0.0199 kilograms per year per capita against 0.0109 kilograms per year per capita in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.009 kilograms per year per capita.

That makes USSR's figure about 1.8 times Central African Republic's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, USSR has been ahead every year.

Central African Republic ranks 122nd and USSR ranks 119th of 185 countries.

USSR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Central African Republic	USSR	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 kilograms per year per capita	0.068 kilograms per year per capita	0.068 kilograms per year per capita	USSR
1970s	0 kilograms per year per capita	0.1124 kilograms per year per capita	0.1124 kilograms per year per capita	USSR
1980s	0 kilograms per year per capita	0.024 kilograms per year per capita	0.024 kilograms per year per capita	USSR
1990s	0 kilograms per year per capita	0.0149 kilograms per year per capita	0.0149 kilograms per year per capita	USSR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit consumption by type, Central African Republic or USSR?: USSR, at 0.0199 kilograms per year per capita against 0.0109 kilograms per year per capita in Central African Republic as of 1991.
What is the difference in fruit consumption by type between Central African Republic and USSR?: 0.009 kilograms per year per capita, with USSR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and USSR?: 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
How do Central African Republic and USSR rank globally for fruit consumption by type?: Central African Republic ranks 122nd and USSR ranks 119th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Fruit consumption by type. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs USSR: Fruit consumption by type. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-consumption-by-fruit-type/central-african-republic/ussr/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-consumption-by-fruit-type/central-african-republic/ussr/">Central African Republic vs USSR: Fruit consumption by type</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Fruit consumption by type
Unit: kilograms per year per capita
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage: 185 places, 9,134 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 18 September 2026

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.