Burundi vs Seychelles: Fruit consumption by type
Burundi
0 kilograms per year per capita
in 2022
Seychelles
0 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Burundi rank
141st
Seychelles rank
141st
Fruit consumption by type over time
- Burundi
- Seychelles
How they compare
Burundi currently reports 0 kilograms per year per capita against 0 kilograms per year per capita in Seychelles, a difference of 0 kilograms per year per capita.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Seychelles ahead.
Burundi ranks 141st and Seychelles ranks 141st of 185 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 1 and Seychelles in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Seychelles | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.001 kilograms per year per capita | 0 kilograms per year per capita | 0.001 kilograms per year per capita | Burundi |
| 2020s | 0.0032 kilograms per year per capita | 0.3233 kilograms per year per capita | 0.3201 kilograms per year per capita | Seychelles |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fruit consumption by type, Burundi or Seychelles?
- Burundi, at 0 kilograms per year per capita against 0 kilograms per year per capita in Seychelles as of 2022.
- What is the difference in fruit consumption by type between Burundi and Seychelles?
- 0 kilograms per year per capita, with Burundi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Seychelles?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Burundi and Seychelles rank globally for fruit consumption by type?
- Burundi ranks 141st and Seychelles ranks 141st of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Fruit consumption by type. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.