Bhutan vs Suriname: Fruit consumption by type
Bhutan
0 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Suriname
0.01 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Bhutan rank
141st
Suriname rank
139th
Fruit consumption by type over time
- Bhutan
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 0.01 kilograms per year per capita against 0 kilograms per year per capita in Bhutan, a difference of 0.01 kilograms per year per capita.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2019 it was Suriname ahead.
Bhutan ranks 141st and Suriname ranks 139th of 185 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 1 and Suriname in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 kilograms per year per capita | 0.02 kilograms per year per capita | 0.02 kilograms per year per capita | Suriname |
| 2020s | 0.0225 kilograms per year per capita | 0.0175 kilograms per year per capita | 0.005 kilograms per year per capita | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fruit consumption by type, Bhutan or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 0.01 kilograms per year per capita against 0 kilograms per year per capita in Bhutan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fruit consumption by type between Bhutan and Suriname?
- 0.01 kilograms per year per capita, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Suriname?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2023.
- How do Bhutan and Suriname rank globally for fruit consumption by type?
- Bhutan ranks 141st and Suriname ranks 139th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Fruit consumption by type. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.