Bhutan vs Madagascar: Fruit consumption by type
Bhutan
0 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Madagascar
0 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Bhutan rank
140th
Madagascar rank
140th
Fruit consumption by type over time
- Bhutan
- Madagascar
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 0 kilograms per year per capita against 0 kilograms per year per capita in Madagascar, a difference of 0 kilograms per year per capita.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2019 it was Madagascar ahead.
Bhutan ranks 140th and Madagascar ranks 140th of 184 countries.
Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 kilograms per year per capita | 0 kilograms per year per capita | 0 kilograms per year per capita | — |
| 2020s | 0.0225 kilograms per year per capita | 0 kilograms per year per capita | 0.0225 kilograms per year per capita | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fruit consumption by type, Bhutan or Madagascar?
- Bhutan, at 0 kilograms per year per capita against 0 kilograms per year per capita in Madagascar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fruit consumption by type between Bhutan and Madagascar?
- 0 kilograms per year per capita, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Madagascar?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2023.
- How do Bhutan and Madagascar rank globally for fruit consumption by type?
- Bhutan ranks 140th and Madagascar ranks 140th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Fruit consumption by type. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.