Iceland vs Morocco: Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per

Iceland
3,172 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Morocco
2,748 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland rank
70th
Morocco rank
73rd

Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per over time

  • Iceland
  • Morocco
-50.0k050.0k100.0k197519992023

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 3,172 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 2,748 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Morocco, a difference of 424 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.2 times Morocco's.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 48 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Morocco ahead.

Iceland ranks 70th and Morocco ranks 73rd of 188 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 3 and Morocco in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Morocco Difference Ahead
1970s 0 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 65.07 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 65.07 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Morocco
1980s 12.07 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 5.74 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 6.33 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 389.26 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 35.89 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 353.36 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 25,280 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 488.32 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 24,792 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Iceland
2010s -13,618 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,341 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 14,959 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Morocco
2020s 367.21 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,662 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,295 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Morocco

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher foreign direct investment, net outflows (bop, current us$), per, Iceland or Morocco?
Iceland, at 3,172 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 2,748 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Morocco as of 2023.
What is the difference in foreign direct investment, net outflows (bop, current us$), per between Iceland and Morocco?
424 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Morocco?
48 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Morocco rank globally for foreign direct investment, net outflows (bop, current us$), per?
Iceland ranks 70th and Morocco ranks 73rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Morocco: Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-direct-investment-net-outflows-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/iceland/morocco/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-direct-investment-net-outflows-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/iceland/morocco/">Iceland vs Morocco: Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
235 places, 9,589 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.