Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Poland: Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per
Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per over time
- Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 40,128 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 75.21 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 40,053 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.
That makes Poland's figure about 533.6 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 48 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Poland ahead.
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 34th and Poland ranks 33rd of 47 groups.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.7091 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 47.34 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 46.63 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | Poland |
| 1980s | 6.37 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 36.57 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 30.2 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | Poland |
| 1990s | -4.78 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 229.96 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 234.74 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | Poland |
| 2000s | 13.65 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 11,889 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 11,875 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | Poland |
| 2010s | 120.84 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 16,498 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 16,377 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | Poland |
| 2020s | 51.3 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 32,815 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 32,764 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher foreign direct investment, net outflows (bop, current us$), per, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or Poland?
- Poland, at 40,128 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 75.21 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in foreign direct investment, net outflows (bop, current us$), per between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Poland?
- 40,053 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Poland?
- 48 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2023.
- How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Poland rank globally for foreign direct investment, net outflows (bop, current us$), per?
- Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 34th and Poland ranks 33rd of 47 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.