Guatemala vs North Macedonia: Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per

Guatemala
6,106 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
North Macedonia
4,503 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
61st
North Macedonia rank
63rd

Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per over time

  • Guatemala
  • North Macedonia
-15.0k-10.0k-5.0k05.0k10.0k197720002023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 6,106 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 4,503 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in North Macedonia, a difference of 1,603 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.4 times North Macedonia's.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 61st and North Macedonia ranks 63rd of 188 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 2 and North Macedonia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala North Macedonia Difference Ahead
1990s 6,192 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 52.18 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 6,139 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s -3,052 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 773.84 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3,826 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre North Macedonia
2010s 1,041 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2,885 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,844 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre North Macedonia
2020s 5,242 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3,585 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,657 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher foreign direct investment, net outflows (bop, current us$), per, Guatemala or North Macedonia?
Guatemala, at 6,106 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 4,503 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in North Macedonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in foreign direct investment, net outflows (bop, current us$), per between Guatemala and North Macedonia?
1,603 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and North Macedonia?
27 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and North Macedonia rank globally for foreign direct investment, net outflows (bop, current us$), per?
Guatemala ranks 61st and North Macedonia ranks 63rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs North Macedonia: Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-direct-investment-net-outflows-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/north-macedonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-direct-investment-net-outflows-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/north-macedonia/">Guatemala vs North Macedonia: Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
235 places, 9,589 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.