Guatemala vs India: Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per

Guatemala
6,106 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
India
4,668 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
61st
India rank
62nd

Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per over time

  • Guatemala
  • India
-15.0k-10.0k-5.0k05.0k197519992023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 6,106 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 4,668 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in India, a difference of 1,438 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.3 times India's.

The two have swapped places 15 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1977 it was India ahead.

Guatemala ranks 61st and India ranks 62nd of 188 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 2 and India in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala India Difference Ahead
1970s 0 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 0 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 0 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
1980s -1.87 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1.48 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3.35 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre India
1990s 2,651 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 32.64 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2,618 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s -3,052 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2,521 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 5,573 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre India
2010s 1,041 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3,323 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2,282 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre India
2020s 5,242 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 4,774 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 468.71 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher foreign direct investment, net outflows (bop, current us$), per, Guatemala or India?
Guatemala, at 6,106 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 4,668 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in India as of 2023.
What is the difference in foreign direct investment, net outflows (bop, current us$), per between Guatemala and India?
1,438 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and India?
44 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and India rank globally for foreign direct investment, net outflows (bop, current us$), per?
Guatemala ranks 61st and India ranks 62nd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs India: Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-direct-investment-net-outflows-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/india/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-direct-investment-net-outflows-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/india/">Guatemala vs India: Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
235 places, 9,589 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.