East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Malta: Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per
Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per over time
- East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 80.32 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 16,057 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 80.30 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.
That makes Malta's figure about 5,002.2 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Malta ahead.
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 5th and Malta ranks 3rd of 47 groups.
Across the 6 decades both report, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) averaged higher in 2 and Malta in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.1324 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 0 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1324 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) |
| 1980s | 42.9 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 0 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 42.9 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) |
| 1990s | 328.9 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 130,474 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 130,145 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | Malta |
| 2000s | 1,838 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 17.68 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 17.68 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | Malta |
| 2010s | 9,435 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 30.15 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 30.14 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | Malta |
| 2020s | 14,176 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 126.78 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 126.77 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher foreign direct investment, net outflows (bop, current us$), per, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Malta?
- Malta, at 80.32 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 16,057 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in foreign direct investment, net outflows (bop, current us$), per between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Malta?
- 80.30 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Malta?
- 53 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2023.
- How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Malta rank globally for foreign direct investment, net outflows (bop, current us$), per?
- East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 5th and Malta ranks 3rd of 47 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.