China vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per
Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per over time
- China
- Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
How they compare
China currently reports 24,038 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against -44.87 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), a difference of 24,083 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.
That makes China's figure about 535.7 times Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)'s.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 42 shared years of data; in 1982 it was Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ahead.
China ranks 41st and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 38th of 188 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 48.27 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 15.67 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 32.6 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | China |
| 1990s | 304.48 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 79.86 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 224.61 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | China |
| 2000s | 2,050 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 93.24 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 1,957 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | China |
| 2010s | 12,531 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 342.88 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 12,189 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | China |
| 2020s | 20,458 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 66.07 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 20,391 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher foreign direct investment, net outflows (bop, current us$), per, China or Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- China, at 24,038 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against -44.87 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in foreign direct investment, net outflows (bop, current us$), per between China and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- 24,083 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- 42 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2023.
- How do China and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank globally for foreign direct investment, net outflows (bop, current us$), per?
- China ranks 41st and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 38th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.