Canada vs Chile: Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per

Canada
10,435 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile
11,295 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Canada rank
52nd
Chile rank
50th

Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per over time

  • Canada
  • Chile
010.0k20.0k30.0k197019962023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 11,295 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 10,435 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Canada, a difference of 860 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Canada's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Canada ahead.

Canada ranks 52nd and Chile ranks 50th of 188 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 4 and Chile in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Chile Difference Ahead
1970s 222.82 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 5.43 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 217.39 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Canada
1980s 561.43 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 17.13 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 544.3 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Canada
1990s 1,620 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,246 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 373.46 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Canada
2000s 5,021 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 4,353 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 668.35 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Canada
2010s 7,099 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 13,898 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 6,799 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Chile
2020s 9,438 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 14,612 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 5,174 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher foreign direct investment, net outflows (bop, current us$), per, Canada or Chile?
Chile, at 11,295 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 10,435 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Canada as of 2023.
What is the difference in foreign direct investment, net outflows (bop, current us$), per between Canada and Chile?
860 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Chile?
49 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2023.
How do Canada and Chile rank globally for foreign direct investment, net outflows (bop, current us$), per?
Canada ranks 52nd and Chile ranks 50th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Chile: Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-direct-investment-net-outflows-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/canada/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-direct-investment-net-outflows-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/canada/chile/">Canada vs Chile: Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
235 places, 9,589 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.