Burkina Faso vs Zambia: Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per

Burkina Faso
164.8 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
206.1 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Burkina Faso rank
115th
Zambia rank
114th

Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Zambia
-1.0k01.0k197419982023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 206.1 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 164.8 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Burkina Faso, a difference of 41.3 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.3 times Burkina Faso's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1978 it was Burkina Faso ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 115th and Zambia ranks 114th of 188 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 4 and Zambia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Zambia Difference Ahead
1970s 2.07 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 0 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2.07 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Burkina Faso
1980s 0.5331 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 0 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 0.5331 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Burkina Faso
2000s -43.23 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 164.49 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 207.72 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
2010s 169.19 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 71.32 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 97.86 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Burkina Faso
2020s 16.78 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre -106.13 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 122.91 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Burkina Faso

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher foreign direct investment, net outflows (bop, current us$), per, Burkina Faso or Zambia?
Zambia, at 206.1 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 164.8 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Burkina Faso as of 2023.
What is the difference in foreign direct investment, net outflows (bop, current us$), per between Burkina Faso and Zambia?
41.3 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Zambia?
28 years are reported by both, from 1978 to 2023.
How do Burkina Faso and Zambia rank globally for foreign direct investment, net outflows (bop, current us$), per?
Burkina Faso ranks 115th and Zambia ranks 114th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Zambia: Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-direct-investment-net-outflows-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-direct-investment-net-outflows-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/zambia/">Burkina Faso vs Zambia: Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
235 places, 9,589 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.