Cyprus vs IDA & IBRD total: Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per capita

Cyprus
1,144 BoP, current US$ per person
in 2025
IDA & IBRD total
42.58 BoP, current US$ per person
in 2025
Cyprus rank
20th
IDA & IBRD total rank
23rd

Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per capita over time

  • Cyprus
  • IDA & IBRD total
-100.0k-50.0k050.0k100.0k197019972025

How they compare

Cyprus currently reports 1,144 BoP, current US$ per person against 42.58 BoP, current US$ per person in IDA & IBRD total, a difference of 1,101 BoP, current US$ per person.

That makes Cyprus's figure about 26.9 times IDA & IBRD total's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 50 shared years of data; in 1976 it was IDA & IBRD total ahead.

Cyprus ranks 20th and IDA & IBRD total ranks 23rd of 192 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Cyprus averaged higher in 4 and IDA & IBRD total in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cyprus IDA & IBRD total Difference Ahead
1970s 0 BoP, current US$ per person 0.1166 BoP, current US$ per person 0.1166 BoP, current US$ per person IDA & IBRD total
1980s 0.5132 BoP, current US$ per person 0.4375 BoP, current US$ per person 0.0757 BoP, current US$ per person Cyprus
1990s 42.7 BoP, current US$ per person 2.8 BoP, current US$ per person 39.9 BoP, current US$ per person Cyprus
2000s 7,846 BoP, current US$ per person 16.94 BoP, current US$ per person 7,829 BoP, current US$ per person Cyprus
2010s 46,222 BoP, current US$ per person 45.01 BoP, current US$ per person 46,177 BoP, current US$ per person Cyprus
2020s -23,696 BoP, current US$ per person 47.3 BoP, current US$ per person 23,744 BoP, current US$ per person IDA & IBRD total

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher foreign direct investment, net outflows (bop, current us$), per capita, Cyprus or IDA & IBRD total?
Cyprus, at 1,144 BoP, current US$ per person against 42.58 BoP, current US$ per person in IDA & IBRD total as of 2025.
What is the difference in foreign direct investment, net outflows (bop, current us$), per capita between Cyprus and IDA & IBRD total?
1,101 BoP, current US$ per person, with Cyprus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and IDA & IBRD total?
50 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2025.
How do Cyprus and IDA & IBRD total rank globally for foreign direct investment, net outflows (bop, current us$), per capita?
Cyprus ranks 20th and IDA & IBRD total ranks 23rd of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cyprus vs IDA & IBRD total: Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-direct-investment-net-outflows-bop-current-us-per-capita/cyprus/ida-and-ibrd-total/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-direct-investment-net-outflows-bop-current-us-per-capita/cyprus/ida-and-ibrd-total/">Cyprus vs IDA & IBRD total: Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per capita
Unit
BoP, current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
239 places, 10,039 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.