Latvia vs New Caledonia: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$)

Latvia
402.62 million BoP, current US$
in 2025
New Caledonia
439.55 million BoP, current US$
in 2025
Latvia rank
127th
New Caledonia rank
125th

Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$) over time

  • Latvia
  • New Caledonia
01.0B2.0B3.0B4.0B199220082025

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 439.55 million BoP, current US$ against 402.62 million BoP, current US$ in Latvia, a difference of 36.93 million BoP, current US$.

That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Latvia ahead.

Latvia ranks 127th and New Caledonia ranks 125th of 204 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and New Caledonia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia New Caledonia Difference Ahead
2000s 807.92 million BoP, current US$ 435.35 million BoP, current US$ 372.57 million BoP, current US$ Latvia
2010s 900.06 million BoP, current US$ 1.34 billion BoP, current US$ 436.98 million BoP, current US$ New Caledonia
2020s 1.60 billion BoP, current US$ 486.36 million BoP, current US$ 1.11 billion BoP, current US$ Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher foreign direct investment, net inflows, Latvia or New Caledonia?
New Caledonia, at 439.55 million BoP, current US$ against 402.62 million BoP, current US$ in Latvia as of 2025.
What is the difference in foreign direct investment, net inflows between Latvia and New Caledonia?
36.93 million BoP, current US$, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and New Caledonia?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Latvia and New Caledonia rank globally for foreign direct investment, net inflows?
Latvia ranks 127th and New Caledonia ranks 125th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Balance of Payments database, International Monetary Fund (IMF), note: International Monetary Fund, Balance of Payments database, supplemented by data from the United Nations Conference on Trade and D, published as Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs New Caledonia: Foreign direct investment, net inflows. Statizoid, drawing on Balance of Payments database, International Monetary Fund (IMF), note: International Monetary Fund, Balance of Payments database, supplemented by data from the United Nations Conference on Trade and D. Retrieved 26 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-direct-investment-net-inflows-bop-current-us/latvia/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-direct-investment-net-inflows-bop-current-us/latvia/new-caledonia/">Latvia vs New Caledonia: Foreign direct investment, net inflows</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$)
Unit
BoP, current US$
Source
Balance of Payments database, International Monetary Fund (IMF), note: International Monetary Fund, Balance of Payments database, supplemented by data from the United Nations Conference on Trade and D
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
251 places, 12,439 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

Foreign direct investment refers to direct investment equity flows in the reporting economy. It is the sum of equity capital, reinvestment of earnings, and other capital. Direct investment is a category of cross-border investment associated with a resident in one economy having control or a significant degree of influence on the management of an enterprise that is resident in another economy. Ownership of 10 percent or more of the ordinary shares of voting stock is the criterion for determining the existence of a direct investment relationship. Data are in current U.S. dollars.