Mozambique vs Tonga: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square

Mozambique
3,412 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tonga
3,642 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mozambique rank
121st
Tonga rank
119th

Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square over time

  • Mozambique
  • Tonga
-20.0k020.0k40.0k197019962023

How they compare

Tonga currently reports 3,642 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 3,412 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Mozambique, a difference of 230 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Tonga's figure about 1.1 times Mozambique's.

The two have swapped places 17 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Mozambique ahead.

Mozambique ranks 121st and Tonga ranks 119th of 200 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Mozambique averaged higher in 1 and Tonga in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mozambique Tonga Difference Ahead
1970s 1.59 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 8.68 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 7.09 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Tonga
1980s 2.82 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 71.84 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 69.02 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Tonga
1990s 117.31 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 929.33 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 812.02 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Tonga
2000s 497.97 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 11,610 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 11,112 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Tonga
2010s 4,658 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 8,859 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 4,202 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Tonga
2020s 4,511 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3,339 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,172 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per square, Mozambique or Tonga?
Tonga, at 3,642 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 3,412 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Mozambique as of 2023.
What is the difference in foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per square between Mozambique and Tonga?
230 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Tonga ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Tonga?
52 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2023.
How do Mozambique and Tonga rank globally for foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per square?
Mozambique ranks 121st and Tonga ranks 119th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mozambique vs Tonga: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-direct-investment-net-inflows-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mozambique/tonga/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-direct-investment-net-inflows-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mozambique/tonga/">Mozambique vs Tonga: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
247 places, 11,736 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.