Mongolia vs Zimbabwe: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square

Mongolia
1,442 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
1,562 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mongolia rank
146th
Zimbabwe rank
144th

Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square over time

  • Mongolia
  • Zimbabwe
-2.0k02.0k197019962023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 1,562 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 1,442 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Mongolia, a difference of 120 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1981 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Mongolia ranks 146th and Zimbabwe ranks 144th of 200 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 4 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mongolia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1980s 0.0113 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre -12.96 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 12.97 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Mongolia
1990s 9.17 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 263.48 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 254.31 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 173.04 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 112.11 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 60.93 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Mongolia
2010s 947.8 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 872.56 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 75.23 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Mongolia
2020s 1,387 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 858.8 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 528.51 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Mongolia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per square, Mongolia or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 1,562 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 1,442 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Mongolia as of 2023.
What is the difference in foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per square between Mongolia and Zimbabwe?
120 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Zimbabwe?
41 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2023.
How do Mongolia and Zimbabwe rank globally for foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per square?
Mongolia ranks 146th and Zimbabwe ranks 144th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mongolia vs Zimbabwe: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-direct-investment-net-inflows-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mongolia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-direct-investment-net-inflows-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mongolia/zimbabwe/">Mongolia vs Zimbabwe: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
247 places, 11,736 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.