Mexico vs Uganda: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square

Mexico
15,784 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Uganda
14,929 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mexico rank
82nd
Uganda rank
85th

Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square over time

  • Mexico
  • Uganda
010.0k20.0k30.0k197019962023

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 15,784 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 14,929 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Uganda, a difference of 855 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Mexico's figure about 1.1 times Uganda's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Mexico has been ahead every year.

Mexico ranks 82nd and Uganda ranks 85th of 200 countries.

Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico Uganda Difference Ahead
1970s 271.12 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3.46 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 267.65 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Mexico
1980s 1,228 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2.48 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,226 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Mexico
1990s 4,393 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 454.58 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3,938 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Mexico
2000s 12,327 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2,193 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 10,135 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Mexico
2010s 16,880 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 4,649 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 12,231 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Mexico
2020s 17,626 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 10,954 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 6,671 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per square, Mexico or Uganda?
Mexico, at 15,784 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 14,929 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Uganda as of 2023.
What is the difference in foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per square between Mexico and Uganda?
855 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Uganda?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Mexico and Uganda rank globally for foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per square?
Mexico ranks 82nd and Uganda ranks 85th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs Uganda: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-direct-investment-net-inflows-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mexico/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-direct-investment-net-inflows-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mexico/uganda/">Mexico vs Uganda: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
247 places, 11,736 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.